NEW DELHI: An Open House Discussion is to be held on 1 November in New Delhi next month on ways to find out easier ways of doing broadcast business and cause least harassment to entrepreneurs.
With the fast changing regulatory framework for the media and entertainment sector, which in India is one of the fastest growing, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had issued a pre-consultation paper in April this year later followed up with a consultation paper in July.
The Government has launched an ambitious programme of regulatory reforms aimed at making it easier to do business in India. The programme aims to pinpoint the bottlenecks and ease them to create a more business-friendly environment. The efforts have yielded some results with India ranked at 130 according to the World Banks’ Ease of Doing Business report. However, there is still huge scope for further improvement.
TRAI notes that the International Monetary Fund has branded India as the brightest spot in the Global Economy. Several Global Institutions have projected India as the leading destination for FDI in the World and a number of recent global reports and assessments, show that India has considerably improved its policies, practices and economic profile.
The aim is also to remove entry barriers by laying down well defined and transparent procedures and processes. This will create a level playing field for competition in the sector and facilitate innovation and technology adoption for providing better quality of services. The sector can then attract investment through investor friendly policies
Subjects to be covered are related to processes and procedures for obtaining permission/license/registration for the following broadcasting services and subsequent compliances connected with these permissions.
The fields include:
Uplinking of TV channels
(b) Downlinking of TV channels
(c) Teleport services
(d) Direct-to-home services
(e) Private FM services
(f) Headend-in-the sky services
(g) Local Cable Operators
(h) Multi System Operators
(i) Community Radio Stations
The questions raised are:
1. Is there a need for simplification of policy framework to boost growth of satellite TV industry? If yes, what changes do you suggest in present policy framework relating to satellite TV channels and why?
2. Is there a need in present policy framework relating to seeking permission for making changes in the name, logo, language, format, etc. related to an operational satellite TV channel? If so, what changes do you suggest and why? Is there a need for simplification of policy framework to boost growth of satellite TV industry? If yes, what changes do you suggest in present policy framework relating to satellite TV channels and why?
3. Do you agree witb some of the stakeholders comments at the pre-consultation stage that Annual Renewal Process of TV channels needs simplification?
4. Do you agree with stakeholders’ comments that coordination with multiple agencies/ Government departments related to starting and operating of a TV channel can be simplified? If so, what should be the mechanism and framework for such single window system?
5. Is present framework of seeking permission for temporary uplinking of live coverage of events of national importance including sports events is complicated and restrictive? If yes, what changes do you suggest and why?
6. Do you feel the need to simplify policy framework for seeking permission/license for starting and running of following services:
(iii) Teleport services
(iv) DTH service
7. As per your understanding, why open sky policy for Ku band has not been adopted when it is permitted for ‘C’ band? What changes do you suggest to simplify hiring of Ku band transponders for provision of DTH/HITS services?
8. What are the operational issues and bottlenecks in the current policy framework related to:
(iii) Teleport services
(iv) DTH service
How these issues can be simplified and expedited?
9. What are the specific issues affecting ease of doing business in cable TV sector? What modifications are required to be made in the extant framework to address these issues?
10. Is there a need to increase validity of LCO registration from one year? In your view, what should be the validity of LCO registration?
11. What are the issues in the extant policy guidelines that are affecting the ease of doing business in FM sector? What changes and modifications are required to address these issues?
12. Is there a need to streamline the process of assignment of frequency by WPC and clearances from NOCC to enhance ease of doing business? What changes do you suggest and why?
13. What are the reasons for delay for allocation of frequencies by WPC? What changes do you suggest to streamline the process?
14. What are the key issues affecting the indigenous manufacturing of various broadcasting equipments and systems. How these issues can be addressed?
15. Is there any other issue which will be relevant to ease of doing business in broadcasting sector? .
16. Are there any issues in conducting trial projects to assess suitability of a new technology in broadcasting sector?
17. What should the policy framework and process for consideration and approval of such trial projects?
