Starts 3rd October

Vanita Keswani

Madison Media Sigma

Poulomi Roy

Joy Personal Care

Hema Malik

IPG Mediabrands

Anita Kotwani

Dentsu Media

Archana Aggarwal

Ex-Airtel

Anjali Madan

Mondelez India

Anupriya Acharya

Publicis Groupe

Suhasini Haidar

The Hindu

Sheran Mehra

Tata Digital

Rathi Gangappa

Starcom India

Mayanti Langer Binny

Sports Prensented

Swati Rathi

Godrej Appliances

Anisha Iyer

OMD India

  • Six-hour lag time for DD in soccer World Cup telecast likely

    Ten Sports, which holds the telecast rights for the upcoming FIFA World Cup, looks like having a six-hour lead time o

  • IBF move to oppose CAS does not constitute voice of broadcasting fraternity: Sahara TV

    It is not just Subhash Chandra and his Zee TV that have struck a discordant note vis--vis the Indian Broadcasting Fed

  • Adidas signs on as presenting sponsor of ESPN’s online football World Cup coverage

    Official World Cup sponsor Adidas has signed on as presenting sponsor of ESPN.com’s complete online coverage of the 2

  • Pepsi's new ad brings SRK, Kareena and Sami together

    Cola wars are hotting up in tandem with the soaring mercury.

  • Mum's the word at Hallmark's second annual event

     Hallmark tried a different tack for promoting its Mother's Day specials this year.

  • IBF move to oppose CAS
    does not constitute voice of broadcasting fraternity: Sahara TV

    Submitted by ITV Production on May 13, 2002

    It is not just Subhash Chandra and his Zee TV that have struck a discordant note vis-୶is the Indian Broadcasting Federation‘s (IBF) opposition to the government‘s moves to introduce conditional access system (CAS).

    Free-to-air channel Sahara TV, also an IBF member, in an official release issued yesterday decried the decision of the IBF committee to oppose CAS.

    Terming the IBF‘s opposition to the proposed CAS as a ‘factional and anti-consumer move‘, Sumit Roy, head of Sahara TV, a free-to-air channel, said that the IBF had not taken a majority of its members into confidence while opposing the government‘s move to amend the Cable TV Regulation Act.

    "The IBF on Friday, 10 May, had called for a select meeting of channel heads who opposed the Centre‘s move to the proposed amendment in the Cable Regulation Act. Surprisingly, all those channels which are free to air and form a majority in the Indian broadcasting industry were not invited to the meeting despite being key members," the release states.

    Roy said that the decision of a fraction of the IBF could not be constituted as the "voice of the Indian broadcasting industry" as it urgently required a broad-based review and debate among all the industry players.


Subscribe to