Starts 3rd October

Vanita Keswani

Madison Media Sigma

Poulomi Roy

Joy Personal Care

Hema Malik

IPG Mediabrands

Anita Kotwani

Dentsu Media

Archana Aggarwal

Ex-Airtel

Anjali Madan

Mondelez India

Anupriya Acharya

Publicis Groupe

Suhasini Haidar

The Hindu

Sheran Mehra

Tata Digital

Rathi Gangappa

Starcom India

Mayanti Langer Binny

Sports Prensented

Swati Rathi

Godrej Appliances

Anisha Iyer

OMD India

  • TV 18 Q1 results on 22 July


    Submitted by ITV Production on Jul 15, 2002

    Television Eighteen India‘s (TV18) board is scheduled to meet on 22 July 22 to consider the unaudited financial results for the quarter ended 30 June, and audited financial results for the year ended 31 March, reports bseindia.com.
    The board will also consider the introduction and implementation of employees stock option plan 2002 as well as fix up record date for the AGM as well as book closure dates for the AGM.

  • Disney Channel launches in Indonesia

    Submitted by ITV Production on Jul 15, 2002

    The arrival of the Big Mouse in India may be delayed but it is setting up shop in other parts of the region. AsiaNet-ABC Cable Networks Group today announced plans to launch the Disney Channel in Indonesia beginning this month. The channel will launch on cable via PT Broadband Multimedia‘s Kabelvision and on DTH through PT Matahari Lintas Cakrawala‘s Indovision Digital. The announcement was made by David Hulbert, president of Walt Disney Television International.

    "Asia is an important region for the growth of Disney Channels throughout the world," an official release quoted Hulbert as saying. "Launching the channel into Indonesia is another major step in expanding our presence throughout the region," he added.

    The agreements were signed in Jakarta in June and the channel will be made available this month on the basic tier of both platforms.

    "With this launch, our Disney Channel Asia feed has expanded into six countries in just over two years," says Jon Niermann, managing director for branded television - Asia Pacific for Walt Disney Television International. "After launching in South Korea in April, we‘re very pleased to bring the magic of Disney into more homes in the region with the addition of Indonesia."

    Disney Channel Asia is headed by managing director Raymund Miranda and is now available in Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei and the Philippines. Launched in January 2000, it is a multi-language feed with both dubbing and subtitling in Mandarin, a Korean feed with subtitling, and a main feed in English. The Indonesian feed will launch in English with plans to dub into Bahasa Indonesia in the future. From launch, Disney Channel will reach 70 per cent of Pay TV households throughout Indonesia, the release says.

    The Asia feed is one of three feeds dedicated to the Asia market, the two others being Taiwan and Australia. There are 15 Disney Channels worldwide now covering 54 countries.

    ABC Cable Networks Group is based in Burbank, California and manages The Walt Disney Company‘s interest in global television businesses, including the wholly-owned international Disney Channels and the company‘s majority interest in the international Fox Kids channels. ABC Cable Networks Group also manages the Disney-branded and Fox Kids-branded kids programming on television platforms around the world.

    Walt Disney Television International - Asia Pacific is responsible for the consolidated international free and pay television activities of the Walt Disney Company and ABC Inc. in the region. These activities include program sales (Buena Vista International Television), production and the development and management of Disney Channels and other international broadcasting investments in Asia Pacific.

    The Disney Channel is currently available on pay TV in eight Asia-Pacific markets: Australia, Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Disney branded programs are broadcast on local free-to-air networks in 12 countries around the region, reaching a total audience of 300 million in Asia-Pacific, the release says.

  • First day at office for Sunil Lulla as SET executive V-P

    Submitted by ITV Production on Jul 15, 2002

    MUMBAI: That Sunil Lulla would be joining Sony Entertainment Television was first reported in indiantelevision.com (on 8 June). Today it was made official with the announcement that Lulla had joined SET as executive vice-president.
    Lulla joins SET as a key member of the management team and will report directly to SET India CEO Kunal Dasgupta. Lulla will be the business head for the prime channel of the company viz. SET and will focus on programming and marketing of the channel with a view to drive higher viewership in to the channel and further strengthen the SET brand, an official release says.

    With the induction of Sunil Lulla the senior management team at Sony Entertainment Television is now complete. The other key members of the team are: NP Singh (chief financial officer), Rajat Jain (executive V-P - MAX), Rohit Gupta (executive V-P - sales and revenue management), Shantonu Aditya (senior V-P - distribution) and Rajan Singh (senior V-P international business).

    The last position he held was CEO, Valuebridge, a consultancy business set up by venture capital firm AtIndia and advertising major HTA. He has also been the CEO of indya.com. Lulla has held various other senior management positions through his career viz. V-P - marketing at United Distillers and Vintners, general manager - MTV India, client services director at J Walter Thompson (Taiwan), general manager - marketing of HMV and associate account director at HTA Ltd.

    Lulla has done his masters in management studies from the SP Jain Institute and brings with him 18 years of experience in marketing and general management, the release states.

  • CAS bill trawling uncharted waters, says survey

    Submitted by ITV Production on Jul 15, 2002

    NEW DELHI: The issue of conditional access system (CAS) is generating renewed heat on the eve of its expected passage in the Indian Parliament‘s Upper House (Rajya Sabha) and a recent survey carried out at Broadcast Asia in Singapore points out that India is attempting to introduce CAS in a manner which has not been tested anywhere or, if done so, has failed to have the desired effect.

    No other country in Asia has successfully mandated CAS as the technology for addressability has largely been left to market forces to determine, the survey carried out by an Indian legal firm says.

    The government set up a task force on CAS comprising prominent members of the broadcasting community to go into the issue and it made its recommendations late last year. A perusal of the provisions of the bill that is to be tabled in the Rajya Sabha however, indicate a great variance between the recommendations of the task force and what the government proposes.

    The Cable TV (Networks) Regulation Amendment Bill 2002 gives the government far reaching powers much beyond anything contemplated by the task force. If the bill is cleared, India will join South Korea and Singapore as the only Asian countries where the use of set top boxes (STBs) or similar technology and tiering for cable systems are mandated by a Central law. Hong Kong, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Taiwan in Asia as well as the US and UK are all countries that have allowed market forces to make these determinations.

    For example, the study points out, in China pricing of channels is fixed but that is done at the local level of governance and not through a Central legislation as is being attempted in India. "In fact it appears that no country in the world has enacted a legislation that is directly analogous to the Bill. The concept of CAS proposed in the (Indian) Bill is, therefore untested. The provisions of the bill should be carefully considered to ensure that there is minimal disruption to the cable and satellite TV industry, which employs close to 30,000 people, generating revenue close to Rs 40 billion, the study says. "Any disruption in its functioning would have major socio-economic consequences," the study, being circulated amongst Rajya Sabha members, says.

    In addition the bill differs from the recommendations of the government-sponsored task Force on CAS on controlling the size and composition of the basic tier of service. Although current "must carry" regulations mandate carriage of certain public service broadcaster (Doordarshan) channels, government determination of the inclusion and exclusion of any other channels in the basic tier amounts to a form of censorship that was not recommended by the Task Force, the study points out.

    Also, the Bill does not adequately address the Task Force recommendations that cable operators be more accountable and transparent, providing more efficient and responsive service through methods, including accurate billing and collection system.

    The study also points out that, for example, though the Task Force made no recommendation on the issue of price differentiation in different areas, the Bill proposes to do that. "Such a differentiation will create a large administrative burden for the local and national governments as each area will need to be monitored and price fixed. Again, the Bill does not outline its plan for determining the pricing in different markets," the study explains.

    Dwelling on the fact that adoption of CAS is market driven in almost every jurisdiction in Asia, the study says. For example, STBs are mandated in Singapore for new TVs, but old ones continue to receive cable without STBs.

    Price controls exist in China and Taiwan at the local level, not through a national level legislation.

    COMPARISON WITH SOME OTHER ASIAN COUNTRIES
    Indonesia: Use of CAS is market driven. There are no regulations and CAS may be used by the two existing Multi-System Operators (MSO) among several delivery solutions.

    Malaysia: Use of CAS is market driven. There are no regulations. Apart from licensing channels, the government has retained minimal control. The cable market is small and the only cable operator recently went bankrupt as consumers prefer DTH.

    Korea: CAS is one of several options available in the market and its adoption has been entirely market driven. The cable market is large and heavily regulated. There are different tiers with the basic tier available at a low cost. Two-way addressability was recently introduced and now you need a STB to receive the different tiers. This has caused consolidation of the market as small operators are unable to compete with larger MSOs. The smaller operators have simply been put out of business and have had to shut down. This could happen in India.

    Taiwan: There are no regulations to mandate adoption of CAS or STBs as the process is essentially market driven. Taiwan has licensing and content restrictions, but apart from this, the government is not trying to change or regulate the structure or mandate technology, although the issues are similar to India in that there are many relay operators and content sensitivity. There are four MSOs with several smaller players operating in the country. There is price control and a content code.

    Phillipines: There is one basic cable service. STBs have become necessary and this has forced consolidation of the market. Although there were many MSOs earlier, the number has now reduced.

    Thailand: There is minimal regulation. CAS is not regulated. The cable market is very small, and the cable operator is owned by the company that has the DTH rights for the whole country. Effectively a monopoly with one MSO.

    Hong Kong: STBs are needed. Tiering is present and is wholly market driven. There is a single cable operator who has a license to operate, apart from this there are no other regulations.

    Japan: Primarily DTH and digital cable. Broadband services are available - no regulation, all market driven.

    Singapore: Primarily cable. New TV owners are opting for DTH although old TV owners prefer cable which is available without a STB. The process is entirely market driven so there are no regulations mandating CAS. Singapore does control the composition of the basic tier.

    Argentina, on the other side of the world, tried like India to fix prices. The price control resulted in a sharp decline in the quality of programming and this caused consumers to switch over en masse to DTH. The cable market has collapsed subsequently. The ceiling on price killed the industry as people wanted better quality programming and value added services which the cable industry because of price restrictions was not able to provide.

    A BRIEF COMPARISON WITH REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE
    The CAS scheme differs from the recommendations of the Task Force in the following ways:

    1. Must-carry provisions for Doordarshan channels were recommended by the Task Force. "This may be achieved without the Government assuming the power to specify any channel other than the public broadcaster as this would amount to directing the choice of the viewers and their right to free access to information would be infringed," points out a Delhi-based media analyst.

    2. The Task Force had suggested that package of services should be left to the market. There is no rationale behind the Government assuming control of the package of services. Nor did the Task force recommend control of the number of channels. "The Government has explained that it mean to specify only the minimum number of channels, but this is not clear from the language of the section," the analyst said.

    3. The Task force was silent on the issue of price differentiation in different areas. It did not say that the receiver set technology should be limited to the current technology that exists in India without scope for technological upgradation.

    4. The Task Force had suggested that the consumer should be educated on the cost of content creation and distribution. This recommendation has not been addressed anywhere in the Bill.

    5. The technology for implementing the CAS has been left to the Bureau of Indian Standards. The Broadcasters need to be consulted to see if their recommendations will work for the industry. Without this there will be a gradual shrinking of the market.

  • Presidential polls prevent CATV Act CAS amendment's fresh introduction in Rajya Sabha

    NEW DELHI: The Cable TV Networks (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2002, which was listed for re-introduction in the Rajya

  • CAS will give govt unparalleled powers, says survey

     NEW DELHI: Not only is the Cable TV (Networks) Regulation Bill, 2002, which is supposed to be discussed in Rajya Sab

Subscribe to